Skip to content

Stoke-on-Trent Councillors Criticise New Planning Rules Over Local Democracy Concerns

Opposition councillors in Stoke-on-Trent have criticised new national planning rules which will reduce councillors’ role in deciding applications and remove their power to call controversial proposals into committee.

Stoke Town Hall - Jenna Goodwin
Stoke Town Hall - Jenna Goodwin
THE SIGNAL BRIEF

What’s new: New planning regulations coming into force across England on 31 October will mean fewer applications are decided by councillors and remove ward members’ ability to call applications into committee.

Why it matters: Conservative and Reform UK councillors in Stoke-on-Trent argue the changes could reduce their ability to represent residents, particularly over controversial developments.

The big picture: City council leaders say the practical impact in Stoke-on-Trent will be limited because most planning applications are already determined by officers.

Local Democracy Reporting Service

This article is based on reporting from the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS), a BBC funded initiative set up to strengthen reporting on local democratic issues. The Staffordshire Signal has taken part in the scheme since September 2026, which means we're able to draw on a selection of LDRS stories alongside our own.

Opposition councillors have criticised national changes to planning rules as a ‘slippery slope’.

New regulations will come into force across England on 31 October that will mean fewer planning decisions will be taken by councillors in future.

Ward councillors will also lose the power to ‘call in’ controversial applications to the planning committee.

The government says the changes will speed up planning decisions and accelerate development, but critics believe they undermine local democracy.

Elected members at Labour-run Stoke-on-Trent City Council voted to update the authority’s own rules to align with national policy at their meeting on Thursday.

But opposition Conservative and Reform UK councillors condemned the new regulations, saying that they would reduce their ability to represent residents.

Tory councillor Dave Evans is particularly concerned due to his Baddeley, Milton and Norton ward containing several controversial sites earmarked for housing in the draft local plan.

He said: “I worry about the national trend from the current government of removing anything they see as a block from the planning system. The ‘block’ in this case is democracy, effectively – the democratic right of elected councillors to call in applications. If you stop asking people a question because you don’t like the answer they’re giving you, you’re on a bit of a slippery slope.

“I wouldn’t vote for anything that could end my residents’ ability to call in application on Green Belt land in Norton Green and Ball Green.”
The Mediaeval Baebes in chainmail and black lace, holding flaming torches beneath a stone archway

Competition

2pairs to
win

Win tickets to see the Mediaeval Baebes at Stoke Minster

30th Anniversary Concert • Saturday 19 December

Torchlit processions, ancient songs and voices that sound centuries old, all in one of the city's most atmospheric buildings. Entering is free.

Sign up to the newsletter to enter

Already a subscriber? You're automatically entered.
Closes 11.59pm, Friday 20 November 2026. Full details and T&Cs

Photo: Rob Kelly

Under the new planning system, all technical and routine planning applications in ‘schedule 1’, including minor residential schemes of up to nine homes, will be determined by professional, unelected council officers.

All other applications could potentially be sent to the planning committee for a decision, but only if the chief planning officer and the chair of planning agree to this, with the planning officer having the final say.

Reform councillor Carl Edwards, who also represents Baddeley, Milton and Norton, said he disagreed with this part of the new system.

He said: “I can’t vote for this for one reason. With decisions on whether to bring applications to committee, it will be between the nominated officer and the chair of the planning committee. But the unelected officer gets priority. If there’s a disagreement, the unelected officer gets precedence. If it was the other way around, then I could support this.”

Council leaders say the national change will actually have little impact in Stoke-on-Trent, as the city council already delegates far more planning decisions to officers than neighbouring authorities.

The planning committee has only determined nine applications in 2026, with the vast majority of decisions being taken by officers.

Councillor Finlay Gordon-McCusker, cabinet member for regeneration, insisted that major, controversial applications will still be determined by councillors under the new system.

He said: “What it will do is allow the committee to concentrate on the applications that shape the city, the ones that matter to whole communities, rather than spending time on very minor matters.

“We already have a fairly tight scheme of delegation, so really not a lot will change.

“This will be better for residents, better for applicants, and better for the quality of decisions.

Cllr Gordon-McCusker also stressed that if the council did not incorporate the national changes into its own planning system it could result in decisions being overturned and costs awarded against the authority.

Councillor Andy Platt, chair of the planning committee, also played down the impact of the new regulations in Stoke-on-Trent, saying that ‘effectively nothing changes’.

Written by Phil Corrigan, Local Democracy Reporter.

Why the Signal exists

Real news takes time. Thanks for taking yours.

You've just read a story that took time to get right. No clickbait, no racing to be first, no ads chasing you down the page.

I started The Staffordshire Signal because I got fed up of local news that chased clicks instead of stories. We're independent, not-for-profit, IMPRESS-regulated and owned right here, so we answer to nobody but you.

The honest bit: local news only survives if local people choose it. If we don't, it goes.

Jenna GoodwinFounder and Editor, The Staffordshire Signal

Love what we do?

Buy us an oatcake! Cheese and bacon, if you're feeling generous. Every tip goes straight into local reporting.

Buy us an oatcake

Miss a proper paper?

Staffordshire's only regional printed magazine, full of stories worth sitting down with, delivered to your door.

Get it delivered

Follow on WhatsApp

Our stories, dropped straight into your phone. No group chat chaos, we promise.

Join the channel
What's On

Find something good to do this week

Markets, gigs, history talks and family days out across Staffordshire. Running an event? Add it to our guide and let the county know.

For local businesses

Run a Staffordshire business?

Our readers keep the Signal going, and the businesses who advertise with us help keep it free for everyone. Reach people who read to the end, across our magazine, Signal Weekly, Signal TV and website.

Explore the heart of our county Use the interactive map above to discover local landmarks, heritage sites, and community-vetted spots. Every interaction helps support The Staffordshire Signal’s mission to keep local news free and independent.

Tags: Politics

More in Politics

See all

More from The Staffordshire Signal Newsroom

See all